Marriage, is a stable relationship good ?

Marriage is here defined as two persons making a social and moral commitment each to the other. Such union need not include a commitment to procreate. The sanctity of a relationship evolves from the willful act of the two parties involved. The Church cannot sanctify a relationship, though asking for it to sanction such, could be coveted.

I have adduced that the sexual orientation misprint, the affinity towards the same sex, is a misprint by your 'Maker', not the willful choice by the misimprinted. ( Just as being born a male or female was not an willed choice.) And, I infer too, that homosexuals and heterosexuals are beings of equal morality. Additionally, I interpret that God is intolerant of shams, and, it is better to acknowledge who or what you are, than to deceive.

Along with the Apostle Paul I have no argument against celibacy, but, for both the heterosexual and the homosexual, I deem, living in a committed stable one to one relationship is better than a life of debauchery.

I realize that same sex union is an abomination to many. The clergy should not be asked sanction a marriage against their conscience. Though purists would want another name for it, the concept of a one to one relational legal commitment through civil authority, without religious blessing, if unavailable and/or not desired, is espoused.

I infer that the exoteric phylosophy of today, is, when the sex act is not procreational, then is the confinement of it to only a sanctified partnership, obsolete.

In contrast I interpret Christ to declare that where a man and women have a sanctified vow, if either one of them looks at another man or women to lust, then is it no longer a sanctified relationship.

As with any agreements, exploring issues and seeking counsel, prior to making a commitment, is embraced. It seems apropos to refer to another site that provides discourse reevant to family relationships and that is complementary in content.